• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • News
  • Resources
  • US Office
  • Japan Office
METROLEX IP LAW GROUP logo

METROLEX IP LAW GROUP

Patent and IP Law Attorneys

  • IP Law
    • Patents
    • Copyrights
    • Trademarks
    • IP Management
    • IP Strategy
    • IP Litigation
    • IP Licensing
    • Software Licensing
    • Franchising
    • Due Diligence
    • Opinion Services
  • Industries
    • Automotive Technology
    • Consumer Products
    • Crypto & Blockchain
    • Cybersecurity
    • Entertainment, Sports & Media
    • Life Sciences
    • Materials Science
    • Medical Devices
    • Oil and Gas
    • Plant Variety Protection
    • Renewable Energy
    • Robotics
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • News
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • (202) 828-1008
  • Schedule Consultation
202.828.1008 Request Consultation

Utility Patent Inventions: Requirements and Application Process


April 17, 2023

patented trademarksAlthough there are three types of patents in the U.S.: utility patents, design patents and plant patents, utility patents are the most common patent type. Utility patents generally protect what an invention is (apparatus), how an invention works and is used (method).

Claims to an article of manufacture comprising a computer readable medium, may be used to protect computer software. Other aspects of an invention may be protected by other types of patents, such as a design patent for the physical (ornamental) appearance of an item.

A plant patent may be granted to an inventor who has invented or discovered and asexually reproduced a distinct and new variety of plant.

Plant varieties may also be protected by obtaining a Plant Variety Certification from the U.S. Department of Agriculture by preparing and filing an application with the USDA – a service also provided by Metrolex IP Law Group.

Utility patents can be grouped loosely into five categories based on the type of invention that is covered:

  • A process – a method of achieving a specific result, such as Amazon’s One-Click ordering process.
  • A machine – a device or apparatus with fixed or moving parts that work together to achieve a useful function, such as a computer.
  • An article of manufacture – an object that is not a direct product of nature and that may be produced by a human or machine.
  • A composition of matter – a combination of materials or ingredients that forms a new chemical compound or mixture, such as a drug or drug formulation.
  • An improvement – inventions that improve upon or involve new uses for existing inventions, such as a new indication for a known drug.

These categories are not mutually exclusive, however. Inventions frequently fall under multiple categories, such as a chemical compound (composition of matter) and its method of synthesis (process).

Once acquired, a utility patent lasts for 20 years from the date the patent application was effectively filed allowing its owner to develop an exclusive market by preventing others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing the patented invention.

Utility Patent Requirements

searching patent with magnifying glassTo meet the legal requirements for a U.S. utility patent, inventions must fall into one of the categories listed above. Inventions of abstract ideas, laws of nature or natural phenomena are not considered to meet the requirements for patent. Inventions that fall into the above listed categories but are nonetheless considered to be “directed to” an abstract idea may also be deemed ineligible.

Utility patents also require that the invention be novel, non-obvious:

  • A novel invention is one in which the claimed invention has not been previously known, that is, the invention as claimed does not already exist in the marketplace or has not already been described in a publication, published patent application or issued patent.
  • A non-obvious invention is one which has not been previously known, and it not considered “obvious” in terms of what is previously known, that is, an invention that is sufficiently different from existing products or processes from the perspective of one of skill in the art.
  • A useful invention must perform its intended purpose and have a specific and real-world use. Specificity requires more than just a broad assertion of utility, such as stating the invention is useful to treat cancer vs. merely stating that the invention is useful to treat disease. A real-world use cannot be speculative or require additional research to prove.

Utility Patent Application Process

In order to obtain a U.S. utility patent, the patent application must be filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). Filing an application as a provisional allows more time to gather more data, develop claims, or prepare drawings.

However, a corresponding non-provisional utility patent application must be filed within one year of the provisional application’s filing date.

Although there are no formal requirements for a provisional patent application, the invention must be disclosed in enough detail that it would enable someone who works in the field to make and/or use the invention in order for the later-filed non-provisional application to be able to make use of a provisional priority claim.

In other words, the usefulness of a provisional is proportional to the quality of the disclosure. Provisional patent applications are not examined or published by the USPTO. In contrast, a non-provisional utility patent application must include a detailed description, drawings (if necessary to explain the invention), an abstract and claims.

The claims define what the applicant considers to be the boundaries of the invention. An oath or declaration signed by each inventor is also required, stating that they are the original inventors and authorize the filing of the application.

Once a non-provisional patent application is filed, the official examination process begins and will be published 18 months from the earliest effective filing date. The application is assigned to a patent examiner who reviews the claims in light of both the disclosure of the application and an examiner’s search of the most recent applicable field publications.

copyright symbol on digital screenThe patent examiner typically will mail an Office Action that presents rejections that detail why in the examiner’s opinion, all of the requirements for patentability have not been met, and the applicant responds with legal arguments and/or claims amendments rebutting the patent examiner’s position.

The back-and-forth process may end quickly, or may continue until the patent examiner’s rejections are appealed, or the patent examiner decides that the requirements for patentability have been met and the case becomes allowed. In some cases, an applicant may decide to abandon the application.

The entire process, from filing the non-provisional application to the issuance of a utility patent, generally takes anywhere from 2 to 5 years, but depends on the subject matter of the invention.

Find A Patent Attorney Near You

For expertise, guidance, preparation and execution, work with the patent attorneys at METROLEX IP. We are a full service Patent and Intellectual Property Law firm with offices in Washington D.C. and Osaka, Japan and can make the process of bringing your ideas to fruition easier. For more information, our team of patent attorneys can help guide you through this process, fill out our contact form or call us at (202) 828-1008 today to learn more.

Legal Disclaimer*

Thank you for your interest in the article. Please note that articles published on the METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC website blog are purely for educational and information purposes only. METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC makes no representation regarding the accuracy of articles that are linked in any blog posts or the integrity of the links. The content of any articles linked in the METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC website blog does not necessarily reflect the opinions or position of the firm or any of its partners or members. The articles published on and linked to in the METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC website blog are not to be considered legal advice and reading the articles does not constitute the formation of an attorney-client relationship.

Please feel free to contact the members of METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC with any questions regarding any of the articles posted on the website blog, or if you have any question about a matter for which you may require representation of METROLEX IP LAW GROUP, PLLC.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Generative AI and Its Legal Ramifications
  • Streaming Wars & Intellectual Property: Copyright vs. Patent In Entertainment
  • From Silicon Valley To The Courtroom: Notable Patent Cases Of The Decade
  • Navigating IP Strategy For Protecting Medical Device Innovations
  • Understanding The Plant Variety Protection Act: Safeguarding Innovation In Plant Breeding

Have a Question?

Call us or use the contact form below to discuss your case and we will get back to you immediately.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Get More Information Today

METROLEX IP LAW GROUP is full service Patent and Intellectual Property law firm with offices in Washington D.C. and Osaka. We focus on high-quality work product, and rapid, efficient filing and prosecution across the world, including U.S., Japan, Europe and China.

Speak With An Attorney
METROLEX IP LAW GROUP at the Washington Monument

Footer

METROLEX IP LAW GROUP

US Headquarters 1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500 Washington D.C, 20036, USA
Virginia Office 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, Suite 600 Reston, VA 20190, USA
Japan Headquarters Minamimori-machi 2-1-20, Suite 801 Kita-ku, Osaka 530-0054, Japan
US: (202) 828-1008
Japan: (6) 6314-6530

Company

  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Industries
  • News
  • Resources

IP Law Services

  • Copyrights
  • Due Diligence
  • Franchising
  • Licensing
  • Litigation
  • Management
  • Opinions
  • Patents
  • Software
  • Strategy
  • Trademarks

© 2025 METROLEX IP LAW GROUP · Powered by 321 Web Marketing · Website Privacy Policy & Terms of Use